Do not Pass Go. Do Not Collect $200

I've come out of semi-retirement to post this. Aside from the jabbing with LeBron at the fact that he'll never be as good as Jordan, this commercial fails on all levels. For the most part, this commercial would be a lot more believable with just a simple fix: switch the prizes Lebron and Stacy win. Are you telling me that Stacy here just won a million dollars and that's her reaction? Wouldn't you think she would be a little more excited about winning a million dollars (especially considering if she won a million dollars she could meet her girlfriends at a nicer place for lunch than McDonald's)? And conversely there's LeBron, a millionaire who we're supposed to believe would be excited about winning a free order of fries. Even worse, he looks around with a goofy "i haven't been this pleased with myself since that solitary time I made a clutch shot in the playoffs" look.

You switch their reactions and it's absolutely perfect. Stacy realizes she's won.....FREE FRIES! "AYYYYYAYAYA I can cash this in next time I eat here for lunch and save some money since the only possible explanation I meet my friends at McDonald's for lunch is because I'm completely broke!" Then we cut to LeBron who realizes "ha, I won a million dollars right now! Just figures because I think I'm about 200x cooler than anyone else on the planet thinks." Then he looks around with a wry look on his face thinking how much better he is than everyone else.

Wait, maybe LeBron would be excited about winning fries. I think at this point LeBron is probably excited to win anything. Oh and if LeBron ever actually eats McDonald's he TOTALLY goes by himself and then sits down and eats it right there.

Sidenote: When I first saw the asterisk on the claim that "1 in 4* wins," I thought they were referencing to the fact that for 5 years the monopoly game was rigged.

I can't hold this one in any longer

I haven't had a new post in a good while, but with every viewing of this Corona commercial I grew closer and closer to doing what I just did now: saw the commercial, yelling "that's it, I'VE ABSOLUTELY HAD IT WITH THIS COMMERCIAL" and furiously logged in to the blog so I could complain about it...somehow this will make me feel better next time I see it. ("haha, Corona! You think you won by making this commercial that annoys me tremendously but I have bested you by complaining about the commercial to the whole world! Ok, so more like 5 or 6 of my friends, but anyway).

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but have you ever been served anything in glass bottle on an airplane?! I think the director's cut of this commercial probably ends with this guy and girl breaking their bottles on their arm rests and demanding everyone give them their wallets. (Wait, Quentin Tarantino didn't direct this commercial? Well he should have.)

Yes yes I know, finding Corona in a can is quite rare and seeing someone drink it out of a can is pretty much the least cool thing you can do. Seriously. Michael Phelps drank Corona in a can at a basketball game once on camera and it was controversial because he's too cool to do things like that. Go to google and type in "michael phelps corona" and watch how the auto complete suggests "in a can" to you. You drink Corona in a can and people don't forget.

So I understand that they didn't want to film this commercial using cans and wanted to opt for their trademark bottles instead. I feel like this is another classic case of "well let's just ignore reality because we really like this airplane idea so we're going to do it anyways." Really? This was the only scenario you could think of where you just want to tune out everyone and relax? How about a guy and a girl hanging out at a bar where some guy is singing terrible karaoke? At least that's a scenario that could not be misunderstood as an act of terrorism.

After the first 15 seconds of this commercial I've always already flown into a rage. It couldn't get any worse right? Oh wait, the girl orders a corona too and the flight attendant hands it to her FROM OUT OF FREAKING NOWHERE. Is there some hidden flight attendant sitting in the row in front of this girl with a corona and lime ready to sneakily hand to the flight attendant on the beverage cart in anticipation of the lady's order? There must be, because it's the only possible explanation.

Congratulations Corona, you made me so upset that I defeated my lethargy to write this post. And believe me, that takes a lot to do.

I on the other hand, am badcommercialphobic

I am back from hiatus! Sadly, I’m not entirely sure anyone noticed. For my return to mediocre blogging I’ve decided to write up a post with a slightly different, more investigative approach. One of the criticisms I’ve received on this blog (well let’s be honest, I’ve only received one criticism because my blog is either great or no one cares enough to criticize it) is that I do more complaining than anything and offer no substance or solutions to the problems I present. Today I will (hopefully) silence my critic(s) with a more substantive post.

Over the past decade or so, America has slowly began to see prominent members of society out themselves as being gay as well as an increase in outed people in the general population. Support for the gay community and their rights has never been higher and the idea of someone being homosexual is no longer a taboo subject. Of course, the backlash to this movement seems to be just as passionate in steeping society in their archaic ways.

So what does this have to do with commercials? It seems to me that in recent years the concept of homosexuality has crept its way into commercials. While this seemingly sounds progressive, it isn’t. Now that homosexuality is a more common subject of conversation, it is now relegated to be what any popular subject is to be in commercials—a cheap source of comedy.

From what I’ve seen, there are currently three different commercials airing that incorporate the idea of homosexuality for a laugh (well an attempt at a laugh, since 98% of commercials that are supposed to be funny aren’t). Behold:


This one for Klondike is by far the biggest offender in its blatant homophobia. They take some of the most stereotypical “those guys can’t possibly be gay” figures in the bikers and make them hold hands because they supposedly fear “a moment of intimacy.” In doing so, Klondike is only furthering the mislead belief that “certain types of people” are gay and it would be absolutely ridiculous for a biker to be gay.

Sure Klondike, I’m sure everyone is thinking “haha that’s funny because those two tough guys don’t want to hold hands with each other because they’re afraid of intimacy.” To me it’s abundantly clear that the joke is two MEN are holding hands instead of two people afraid to hold hands because it’s “intimate.” Of course, this “challenge” is hyperbolized as being extremely arduous to the two men because they’re extremely “afraid of intimacy” (read: homophobic).

Klondike clearly knew what they were doing with this commercial by placing the homophobia under the guise of intimacy. If this were really about intimacy, why couldn’t the “challenge” have been a tough biker holding his mom’s hand or something along those lines? And after their time is up, why do two women jump onto the scene and the bikers immediately turn to them and away from each other? It was obvious to Klondike that blatantly saying “can these two men hold hands for 5 seconds?” would not be acceptable…why they thought calling homophobia something else and running with that is beyond me.

Really the only leg Klondike has to stand on would be the defense that they’re mocking that these bikers are homophobic to an embarrassing extent. Then again, calling this series of commercials “what the fudge?” moments seems to furthers the idea that the concept of men holding hands is blasphemous, not the ideas of the men themselves.


While I wouldn’t necessarily expect a frozen confectioner to resort to homophobia to promote their product, it doesn’t surprise me that a beer company would make a commercial such as this one. This one is certainly not as bad as the Klondike ad, but it also perpetuates multiple stereotypes that hinder the promotion of tolerance.

The setting: construction. Again, I presume that the construction scene was picked because some would think it would be inconceivable that a gay man could work in construction. Next the guy imagines he sees the prototypical Cindy Crawford looking woman because of course, this is what a “normal” man should picture in his head as an attractive person. He then asks “what’s your name” to the woman who isn’t actually there and the question instead is directed to the guy bending over in front of him. This scenario of course ends in extreme embarrassment.

Like I said, this commercial isn’t nearly as bad as the first one. But why even broach the subject of homophobia if you don’t have to? This same humor could have been achieved by replacing the bending over male with an old woman or something. A man hitting on an old lady seems more out of the ordinary than a man hitting on another man to me.


This Jack in the Box commercial is certainly a lot tamer than the other two (and definitely tamer than their other ad that encourages smoking weed and driving under the influence), but it still stands out to me. Obviously Jack and the guy hugging each other is supposed to be embarrassing and the girl thinks she has just discovered a huge secret about the two and this is all supposed to be funny because the two don’t want the girl to think they’re gay.

My question is simply: is this the best you really can do? It’s just such a simplistic idea to get a cheap laugh. I really think society as a whole has moved past the idea of “haha look at those guys, they’re gay.”

When those writing and filming these commercials make that advancement, however, remains to be seen.

Being Ridiculously Unrealistic: One of the Staples of Commercials

I understand that commercials aren't meant to be taken seriously (yes, I can hear you yelling "then why the hell do you waste your time on this blog?!") but I feel commercials that blend aspects of realism and the ridiculous are among the worst. I never know whether to take the commercial seriously or if it's just a caricature I'm meant to laugh at. Now sure, this commercial is probably more of a joke than anything but I still think it's entirely plausible that someone's house could be robbed and their piece of junk computer was left behind (though it does seem unusual that someone robbing a house would have the time and desire to steal a computer desk...must have been a hell of a desk).

So the family gets home from their vacation to see their house completely stripped...can you imagine that happening to you?! I would be screaming obscenities, the kid would probably be crying and wondering aloud if they took his xbox, and the wife would immediately dash into the bedroom to see if all her jewelry was gone. So what actually happens in this commercial?

"Oh, we got robbed."

Yep, that's it. No emotion whatsoever. Not even the slightest bit of panic. Thanks for stating the obvious dad! Now you could argue that the family is just in shock..but that argument falls apart as we watch the family meandering throughout the house while seemingly continuing not to care that all of their valuables are gone. Maybe they just have the best insurance money can buy? Still think they would care though.

When the family sees the computer wasn't stolen, it's not "well at least they didn't take the computer"t's "maybe we should get a new computer." This idea is apparently a new one brought on solely by the fact that the computer wasn't stolen and had nothing to do with the fact that it's ancient looking and is likely slow. Maybe it's just me, but I usually value a product's utility over whether or not someone else would want to steal it.

By far the most ridiculous aspect of this commercial though is the fact that family's first plan upon their house being robbed is to buy a new computer...of course that's what someone would do! "I know our house just got ripped apart and we have a million things to replace, but we should totally buy a new computer despite the fact that we have one that we would have definitely kept if not for a robber not wanting it."

So is this a terrible idea for a commercial? No...it might actually be a decent concept. The problem here is they take an obvious satire and then pretend like it isn't a joke. Had the family ran around the house in a panic screaming "OH GOD THE COMPUTER!" thinking the computer is valuable when it in fact isn't, it might have even been funny (technically inept people that don't realize they're living in the past is usually funny). Instead, the commercial opens somberly with a family you believe is shocked beyond emotion and then Staples reveals the punchline they did nothing to set up. Except that by the time you realize the joke it's too late to laugh and probably wasn't that funny anyway.

Extra nitpicking: The couple goes to Staples and they buy a new laptop and the guy says he transfered all their files off their old computer to the new laptop. The wife then asks the Staples guy if he moved the wedding video, the baby pictures, and the taxes onto the the new computer. If I were the Staples guy, I probably would have just said: "Everything that was on your old computer is on this one!" Instead, the Staples guy answers yes to her questions about the sensitive data--almost knowingly. How does he know there's a wedding video on the computer? Hmmmm...

(Thanks to Curtis for the discussion about this one)

Cue Several Things That Make No Sense

Friends don't let friends make commercials drunk...ergo the people who made this commercial don't likely have any friends. I don't even know where to start so I guess we'll just go in order.

1. The party: Who throws a party the first weekend they move in? Why wouldn't this dude just wait until he was settled the following weekend to throw it? "Hey guys, just moved in to my apartment 5 minutes ago, wanna come over and drink? Don't mind the cardboard boxes everywhere and we can set up the 2 bottles of Jose Cuervo that I got for the party on my dresser."

Conclusion: This guy clearly just moved out of his parents' house and is 27 years old and couldn't wait to throw a party, as evidenced by the complete lack of preparation and patience.


2. Guy on the sofa: Why is he sleeping? Did he hit the Cuervo early on and already passed out? I find this unlikely because at any normal party there would be at least like 2 people screwing with him since he passed out with his shoes on. On top of that, the guy is way too light of a sleeper for being a passed out drunkard if he was actually startled awake like that. If he isn't drunk, does that mean he was so exhausted from carrying that couch upstairs the he immediately fell asleep before the party started? If he knew there was going to be a party, wouldn't he opt to sleep elsewhere? If he isn't drunk and didn't fall asleep before the party started, did he fall asleep during the party? Who would go to a party and just decided that they wanted to go to sleep in the middle of everything?

Conclusion: There's a reason he's called the "guy that brought the couch up" and not "the friend that brought the couch up." He is obviously a homeless guy who was promised a ham sandwich if he helped this guy with moving and the homeless guy talked his way into earning a night on the couch. Maybe a hot shower too.


3. The best housewarming gift ever: So this girl just walked into the apartment without knocking or anything? I guess I missed the sign on the door that said "no strangers unless you're a pretty girl in pajamas and will immediately flirt with me upon barging in." Honestly though, who would just walk into a complete stranger's party in their pajamas and look like they're happy to be there? Now if this girl walked in to say "tell your loud friends to shut the hell up" it would make complete sense but it's obvious that isn't the case.

Conclusion: She is referred to as a "gift" because she actually is an escort purchased by a friend as an actual housewarming gift. She's about to say "I heard you just moved in all by yourself and you're used to mom and dad in the room across the hall when you sleep...want some company tonight?"


4. The couple that got off on the wrong floor: Why exactly did they get off on the wrong floor? Do they live in the building and forgot to take their medication and have no idea where they are? Are they supposed to be visiting someone in the building but just decided they didn't want to anymore and would rather drink tequila with a bunch of kids 40 years younger than them?

Conclusion: Someone is going to be very confused in the morning when they get a voicemail that says "Hi John, this is your grandma Gladys. Just wanted to let you know how much fun we had at your engagement party last night. I hope you liked the blender, we should have used it with all that Cuervo we threw back! I know this isn't my place to say, but I didn't think your fiance was very presentable last night. Who doesn't change out of their pajamas when they have guests over?"


5. The Cuervo: I would love to go to a party that had two bottles of Cuervo as the only thing to drink. I would love it even more if there were just shot glasses and nothing to mix/chase the tequila with.

Conclusion: Hold on, I've got to make myself a margarita after I had to watch this commercial six times to write this post.

AT&T Reception vs. Their Commercials: Which is Worse?

Today we welcome back AT&T for another appearance. In the commercial failure hall of shame, AT&T is definitely a first ballot hall of shamer (but not the MVP, that honor obviously goes to values.com). Just as with every commercial pretty much ever, we are presented with our male protagonist being an idiot.

But this idiot has AT&T so his idiocy will be masked by his network's awesome ability to allow him to talk and use the internet at the same time! Wow! Did you just see that? Wait, what did we just see? He saved what, 10 seconds by googling a place to get a reservation while in the process of getting off the phone? Who is watching this commercial with their Verizon iPhone and is thinking "damn, I hope that never happens to me since my phone can't do that?"

AT&T has a few commercials that are based on this same premise of talking and browsing at the same time (and rightfully so since it's about the only advantage they have over Verizon). I imagine their marketing team sat down and brainstormed situations where you would need to be able to use the internet while on the phone at the same time...and you're telling me this was one of the best ideas they had? Why couldn't the guy have been on a business call and gotten an email from his wife asking about dinner? Why couldn't the guy had been on the phone with a potential client and needed to look up some key information about the client while on the phone?

One last thing: If this guy is so tech savvy with his iPhone and making reservations online, why is he sitting in a conference room without a computer and writing out notes?

Trading Logic For Simplicity

So you're looking to buy a car eh? What kind of car are you thinking about? A sedan? An SUV? A truck? A great first question to consider. So you want an SUV? Ok, I can understand that. That brings you to the next decision: what color do you want? That's only natural right? I know when I buy a car I'll be looking for a black coupe. Brand? Model? Year? Who cares, as long as it's the right color it doesn't matter. My friend told me he wanted to buy a 2008 Honda Civic 4 door with a manual transmission and a moonroof and I just laughed at him. Who is that picky about about something they're going to use every day for years?